User blog comment:Morganaforever/Are Arthur and Morgana siblings after all?/@comment-3325613-20120106195747/@comment-5036924-20120107130611

I don't really get why everyone seems to think Morgana is a 'true' heir, and more so than Arthur? Simply being the child of a royal doesn't mean you get the rights which come from being a legitimate child of theirs. If Morgana were a serving girl and still Uther's daughter, then nobody would say she was entitled to the throne, surely? I think maybe it's just because she was already this kind of pseudo-princess that makes it seem like she could be an heir, even though it doesn't make her any more legitimate. Surely a 'true' Pendragon is the child of the ruling Pendragons, which fits Arthur more than Morgana? :/