Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-110.33.239.213-20121226023324/@comment-5367080-20130929153020

Sorry that the messages were split there I don't know what happened :P anyways, no worries Fimber i enjoy the debate :)

Anyway, I see your point on Richard the Lionheart, that was a poor example, ironically despite being English I know my American and Russian history far better XD. Having said that, I stand by Churchill on this one, though he is nothing like Arthur, he is what Great Britain needed to stand tall during World War 2, true his actions costed numerous lives but he did what he could to maintain Britain and although he did it in a way by which Arthur would not approve, he did protect the country.

Onto your saying Arthur could have returned during the Crusades, that much is true, but then I refer back to my previous argument that Arthur was destined to return during Albion's time of need, not that of the "Holy Land", yes what happened there was terrible, but it didn't destroy Britain.

As for the later arguments, I think I cover a lot of those in my reply to Regan!