User blog comment:General MGD 109/Ruler of Nemeth/@comment-5036924-20111218104416

She wouldn't be ruler of Nemeth because she's Princess Mithian, not Queen, and I think there might have been some throwaway reference to her being a "daughter" of the kingdom, not its ruler.

It's possible that she's the heiress if she has no elder/male siblings, although it seemed that she was willing to move to Camelot to be with Arthur (unless that was just for the wedding), which might suggest that she wasn't actually in line to rule. On the other hand the fact that she was going to be used as a settlement with Camelot could mean that she was the heir, which in turn would mean that any child of hers and Arthur's could inherit Camelot and Nemeth.

Either way she has to be the daughter of the current ruler, but it's unclear as to whether or not she's in line for Nemeth's throne, I suppose?