User blog comment:Knightofthecart/Petition/@comment-4683199-20121108215920

That's an awesome idea! but wll the writers even be able to fix such a vast amount of plotholes? But still i like your idea so much, i'll start adding some plotholes that i think were pretty major

(these obviously contain spoilers, but just in case SPOILER ALERT):

1. In Excalibur, when Uther wielded the sword, Kilgharrah got angry and told him to put it in a place where no one can find it, because in the wrong hand it can do great evil. So, instead of throwing it into the lake, why doesn't he just give it to Arthur (like as a gift?) This also applies for The Coming of Arthur, where he could have just gave the sword to Arthur, instead of putting it in the stone.

2. In The Sword in the Stone , Merlin tells Kilgharrah to kill Agravaine's men. So why doesn't he just do that every time there's a war, before the soldiers come to the gates of camelot?

3. "''If his lineage was ever questioned, this would form a test." ''Merlin says this to Arthur about King Bruta, in the same episode as above. However, Uther says in the very first episode "''When I came to this land, this kingdom was mired in chaos, ..." ''implying that he did not originally come from Camelot. And in another episode (I can't remember at the moment) he says that he WON camelot (or something like that.)

4. (I'm not sure about this one) In the Series 5 episodes, a lot of the times, i don't see Arthur wielding Excalibur, because for Excalibur, near the hilt there is a golden part of the sword, but you can't see it in most Series 5 episodes. In fact, the only time i remember seeing it is when Mordred was dubbed. (This may be wrong due to the quality of the player that i watch the episode on.)

This is all i can think of at the moment, but of course there are many others...