Thread:Fimber/@comment-4190137-20130609120413/@comment-5102537-20130612144102

I know, that's the problem.

What bothers me about it is the typical "all against one". I don't like it. The work that someone has done is devalued and, as we could see in the past, a lot of users simply agree with a request without knowing the whole story. Others don't even know the admins but might see a chance to become admins themselves, therefore agree with removing the others. And then there are those who side with certain admins and/or users due to personal friendship but don't decide objectively. Don't get me wrong, I would have every reason to do this procedure with a certain admin here...

However, I really totally dislike this way of removing admins/bureaucrats. But I know that this is the way it is done here.

If it was for me I would simply ask the inactive admins and let them decide whether they want to become active again or not. And those who harm/offend others and don't stop doing this should be removed by the staff. But then, it's not my decision.