User blog comment:Emily Windsnap/What's so great about Lancelot?/@comment-5102537-20120528090910/@comment-5102537-20120531104619

Hmh, I don't know, Emily... I think it was beyond just teasing. They excluded him and left him alone, showed him "his place" in the group because he is just a servant. Teasing means to end it in time and showing that it was all just kidding and joking around, but all they did was giving him some food in the end and still left him being an outsider.

To me, the knights behave like a High School football team with Arthur as their captain. I have tried but I can't see them as the noble knights of the Round Table - and I was especially disappointed with Sir Leon who is beyond that age more than everyone else. I could never imagine Uther's knights, of which Leon was the second leader, doing it with someone, especially not with Uther around. It was so childish. And Lancelot would have been on Merlin's side because he was sensible and mature. I would even think that they wouldn't have done it if Lancelot had been there.

Generally, flawless characters are boring to me, too, but Lancelot was an exception. He was such a blessing among those many weird and immature people. The only serious knight and reasonable man.

And I would have liked to see how he had managed the high-wire act between his friend Merlin and his king Arthur.