Talk:Morgana Pendragon/@comment-4135736-20120924121712/@comment-5102537-20120928220659

But I don't understand how she could have been more humane when considering all the horrific things she did which were even worse than all what she or anyone else had ever done before.

Imagine you hate someone. Then imagine you want that someone dead, which is worse enough. Anyway, the time has come and you can kill that someone or you know that he/she is going to die soon. Would you want to have them suffer even in their death and would you want that the last thing they ever think of and that "haunts" them is your face, meaning causing even more suffering to the one that is already suffering beyond imagination and is about to die anyway? And then imagine it is someone who is suffering because they love you. Would you really call that humane?

Neither can it be called humane to torture people and to kill thousands of people, killing your friends and siblings who have never done anything to you.

Then, as for Lancelot, Merlin had to restore his soul for some reason for which Lancelot thanked him. The fact that he thanked him shows that Lancelot had suffered (his soul) in whatever way and that giving back his soul to him (his dying body) was most important. So Morgana didn't just raised him from the dead and simply sent him back to death where he could rest in peace. The fact that Merlin had to give him back his soul proved that. Morgana was willing to let Lancelot suffer literally for eternity. Why? Because she simply doesn't care and has no heart, otherwise she would have been the one who had restored his soul afterwards. That would have been something that could have shown a glimpse of compassion and humanity.

I wonder why she didn't try to rip Uther off of his soul. I bet if she had the opportunity she would do it instantly and make his soul suffer for eternity.

She has become a heartless monster who doesn't care about anyone or anything.