Board Thread:Rewatching "Merlin" - Season One/@comment-5102537-20130214143847/@comment-5147915-20130226200520

Longlivemerlin wrote: I believe that parts of the legend are true, but not the entire legend. I don't know which part is real or not (that's what makes it so interesting to me.) It actually is a theory that there was an Arthur of Camelot, but there were so many royal kings or princes, because Arthur was such a common name back then, that they mixed up all the Arthur's. You see, according to the Arthurian legend, Arthur fought 12 great battles. But according to historians, the places where they said the battle was fought is too far for one man to travel in his entire lifetime back then. Also too many battles. Therefore, it only makes sense that there was more than one Arthur. Thank you if you read all the way to the end here. And if you understood my crazy writing. Yeah I read all the way to the bottom and understood your so called 'crazy' writing and I actually think it is some pretty smart deduction work of the Arthurian Legends you did. It's actually kind of cool what you thought of. :)