User blog comment:Morgause5/Speculation and possible spoilers (finale)/@comment-4892425-20121222095305/@comment-5102537-20121222112038

Have to disagree here. Someone who needs to kill and threaten the citizens in order to have them obey her can't be a good ruler, not even a slightly bit good ruler. It's what dictators do when srengthening their postions because they know that the people would and will never accept them as rulers if it isn't for the fear they spread. Uther was described as ruling with an iron fist and as being ruthless towards sorcerers but he didn't need to kill his people in order to gain their respect.

There is a reason why the citizens of Camelot didn't accept Morgana. She took the throne violently and by force and caused chaos where there was order before, she ruthlessly killed innocents in the process, tormented (and later killed)  her father, threatened everyone and also Arthur who was loved by the citizens (for whatever reason). She summoned an army of the dead together with Morgause and Camelot's declared enemy Cenred. Plus, she was a soreceress and a lot of people naturally feared magic.

She is totally incapable of ruling because she has no idea whatsoever what the people need and want. They are only subjects and puppets for her but not individuals with needs. The only ones who respect her are those who want to invade/destroy Camelot because they have a common goal.