Board Thread:What If?/@comment-5674726-20140906160841/@comment-24762954-20141005122750

ReganX wrote:

Queen Annis would have had a choice between keeping the territory, thereby increasing her own holdings or, if she didn't want Morgana in her hair or if she didn't want to have to deal with divided loyalties on the parts of her new subjects, she could have given the surrendered half over to Morgana. It's what I would have done in her shoes, as it would mean that Morgana would focus on Arthur and the other half of Camelot rather than on me and my kingdom.

If Queen Annis kept the half of Camelot, I can't see Arthur trying to seize it back. If it ended up in Morgana's hands, he might fight for it or he might not, depending on whether he was willing to risk losing the other half or if he was desperate enough to come to some sort of peace with his sister. I doubt, that giving Morgana half of Camelot would be a good idea. She is sort of an international criminal and a pretender to the throne. It's quite possible that by doing so Annis would make any agreement void. Not to mention, that Morgana is sorceress.