User blog comment:Morganaforever/Finale/@comment-212.76.83.122-20111226103732/@comment-5036924-20111226115528

Not sure I agree with you saying she's a 'true heir'. It depends how you define it, I guess, but a true heir in that time would have meant legitimate, the eldest and probably male. If Uther's first child was a bastard with some servant, would that mean that that child would be the true heir to the throne of Camelot? And although Arthur was conceived with the help of magic, I don't think that makes him any less of a genuine heir. He's still the legitimate son of the King and Queen of Camelot, which Morgana isn't. At most, Arthur and Morgana are equally Pendragon, but only Arthur is recognised as such.

So what's more reasonable is for Morgana to do just as Uther did and take the throne by force. Her legitimacy as a hereditary ruler is pretty negligible since it's not unreasonable for everyone else to doubt she's Uther's daughter at all - the claim is based only on his and her say so.

I don't disagree about wanting Morgana to win, though, because she's still epic. ;) I just don't want her to kill Arthur because I still don't believe she ultimately hates him and I kind of want redemption for her.